Regulating gambling presents a major challenge for any nation. The Republic of Slovenia needed to create its own thorough law for the growing gambling industry immediately after gaining independence. This required a clear break from the old rules of Yugoslavia. The legislative path since then has been a complex process of legal updates and necessary alignment with the European Union.
The first comprehensive legal blueprint for this sector was passed as the Gaming Act of 1995 (Zakon o igrah na srečo, ZIS). This core law immediately created a distinct difference between two main legal forms of gambling. The government sought to keep tight control over this financially sensitive industry. The initial rules strictly limited the market to domestic businesses.
This early legal system divided the market into Classic Games of Chance (lotteries, bingo, and sports betting) and Special Games of Chance (casino table games and slot machines). The act allowed only a small number of private licensees. Today, however, individuals can access expert analysis at casinoonline.si, which offers insights into the performance and regulatory compliance of various international casinos.
The Original Rules
The 1995 Act clearly defined the government’s comprehensive authority over all licensed gambling operations. This authority was enforced through a two-part concession model. This model was intended to separate the market based on its potential for social risk and its ability to generate income. Financial supervision and enforcement units were placed within the Ministry of Finance.
The framework required all companies running Special Games of Chance to receive government approval to operate. The approval period was usually set for ten years, with renewal options possible. The physical casino industry flourished under this highly controlled atmosphere. It mainly served tourists and set up gambling locations near major national borders.
This focused geographic approach increased the inflow of foreign money while limiting its impact on the local population. The government intentionally created barriers to widespread local participation.
European Union Conflicts
Slovenia’s entry into the European Union in 2004 created a significant problem. The national monopoly system conflicted with key EU principles, which guarantee the free movement of services and the freedom of business establishment.
The core of the conflict was over two main issues. The first was the de facto monopoly for Classic Games of Chance, which lacked open, fair bidding for foreign companies. The second was the requirement that companies running Special Games of Chance had to be majority-owned by the Slovenian state or a municipality. This was a clear barrier to foreign investment and business freedom.
The government subsequently made numerous legal changes. These changes were attempts to bring national law into compliance with the higher European legal system. However, they relied on complicated technical requirements to keep the market structure mostly the same.
Digital Gaming Rules
The development of internet-based betting posed a huge difficulty for the existing legal model. This system was originally built only for physical, land-based operations. The 1995 Act simply did not account for the global scope of the internet. New laws were needed after 1995 to deal with unauthorized foreign remote gambling sites available to people in Slovenia.
The first strategy was to pass measures that forced Internet Service Providers to block payments and IP addresses of unlicensed foreign gambling sites. This defensive action ultimately proved ineffective. It could not keep up with the fast-moving and adaptable nature of the international online gaming market.
The following points highlight the key issues at the time:
- Online gambling services were first permitted only as secondary services provided by current land-based license holders.
- This requirement severely reduced the number of legal digital platforms operating within the country’s borders.
- The government-owned companies, specifically Loterija Slovenije and Športna Loterija, kept their exclusive right to offer their classic games online.
- The tight state controls created a large underground market. The Government recognized this situation was harmful to both player safety and tax revenue.
- Lawmakers realized a more practical, open-minded approach was necessary to regain business from international companies.
Enforcement Against Unlicensed Operators
The deployment of internet service provider (ISP) blocking orders represents a significant extension of state authority into the digital realm. These measures are designed to act as a deterrent, physically impeding citizens’ access to platforms operating outside of the concession system.
Payment blocking represents another powerful regulatory tool utilized by FURS to sever the financial lifeline of illegal operators. Financial institutions are mandated to reject transactions identified as relating to unlicensed online gambling activities. This strategy directly attacks the economic viability of the black market, compelling consumers and operators alike toward the domestically licensed environment.
Tax and Revenue Generation
The taxation structure for gaming operators in Slovenia is complex, encompassing concession fees and a specific gambling tax levied on Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR). For classic games of chance, the state-monopoly operators pay a specific percentage of their revenue. For special games of chance, such as those conducted in casinos, operators pay a casino tax:
- The Casino Tax rate is set at 30% of the annual GGR for each casino operation, with specific deductions applied.
- Concession fees, which are substantial, are also payable to the state, with the government limiting the number of land-based concessions to a maximum of 15 for casinos and 45 for gaming halls.
- Winnings exceeding a statutory amount, currently over €300, are subject to a 15 percent tax on the portion exceeding the threshold, which is deducted at source.
The imposition of high tax rates, however, creates an economic imperative for consumers to seek lower-taxed, non-regulated foreign alternatives, a factor complicating the government’s channeling objective.
Legal Changes in the 2020s
The pressure from the European Union and the growing problem of an uncontrollable black market for online gambling forced Slovenia to make a serious legislative push in the early 2020s. The government developed a draft amendment to the existing Gaming Act.
The central objective of this proposed reform was twofold: to eliminate the strict state monopoly over classic games of chance and to relax the severe ownership restrictions placed on special games. This demonstrated a clear shift in government policy, moving away from total state control towards a healthier, competitive licensing system.
Although this system would still be overseen by strict state supervision, it signaled a major change. These proposed amendments were intensively reviewed within government circles and thoroughly discussed with all affected external stakeholders. The government correctly determined that opening the market was the only practical long-term strategy for ensuring the integrity of the regulation and maximizing potential tax revenues.
The 2025 Outlook and Future Trajectory
The current period is characterized by internal governmental review and external pressure to finally enact a new Gaming Act. The Ministry of Finance announced a formal review of the gambling legislation in 2024, explicitly seeking to introduce more systemic changes informed by European Union case law and the regulatory models adopted by other Member States.
Specific points of focus for the potential legislation include:
- Revisiting the limit on the number of concessions to better align with competition principles while safeguarding public interest.
- Establishing a clear, viable licensing framework for online-only operators, potentially decoupling online licenses from the mandatory ownership of a physical, land-based concession.
- Strengthening FURS’s legal mandate to impose direct, efficient enforcement measures against foreign, unlicensed operators without protracted court procedures.
The trajectory toward 2025 suggests that Slovenia is approaching a definitive legislative crossroads. A successful legislative reform will likely result in a hybrid model, maintaining strong governmental oversight and social protections while allowing for a moderately competitive online environment.
Market Liberalization and State Oversight
The evolution of Slovenia’s gambling laws since the passage of the 1995 Act is a chronicle of measured, deliberate adaptation, not revolution. The initial legislation established a strong, protective foundation that successfully integrated the sector into the national economy.
Subsequent legislative attempts, however, demonstrate the profound difficulty inherent in liberalizing a market while simultaneously maintaining the state’s traditional high standards of control and social protection.
The path forward, culminating in the anticipated legislation around 2025, requires a carefully calibrated balance. The state must effectively channel consumer demand toward a domestically regulated, taxed, and monitored environment. This can only be achieved by creating an authorized market appealing enough to compete with the sophisticated offerings of the international black market.
The enduring imperative remains the same: the Republic of Slovenia will continue to act as the final arbiter of gambling provision, ensuring that economic benefit is pursued without compromising the integrity of the public sphere or the welfare of its citizens.
Also Read: How America’s State-by-State Gaming Model is Starting to Mirror APAC
